1.	The paper reports a retrospective  study of nascent entrepreneurs in Padang. These words do not appear in the title.
2.	In general, the English in the paper can be understood. There are a number of terms that are not used in scientific literature when it is written in English. They include “nascent…. The editor could revise some of these terms into generally accepted scientific terms such as start up or new entrans.
3.	It was written that there are sixty four questions in the questionnaire, but in detail explanation only fifty six questions written. Can you check again this explanation.
(In total, the questionnaire contains sixty four questions, which in detail is described as the following: [a] eight questions for the variable of entrepreneurial failure, [b] sixteen questions for the construct of outcomes of learning, [c] twenty questions for the construct of error detection, and [d] twelve questions for the construct of error correction.) 
4.	Hypothesis are not stated in this paper.
5.	It should be Table 2
(Table 1 also shows that the majority of nascent entrepreneurs that we appointed as the research sample are those who first started their business during the age of 18-20 years old.)
6.	What do you mean with “Sample is gender neutral and is regardless the level of educationâ€. Meanwhile the descriptive analyses in this study also include the level of education?
7.	In this part (point 7). Why does study limited only on the level of education? How about age and gender. It needs more elaboration.