<p><strong>Duties of the Authors</strong></p>
<p>Authors of a report of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as objective discussion on its significance. Data and citations should be represented accurately in the paper. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Plagiarism takes many forms, from using another&rsquo;s paper as the author&rsquo;s own paper to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another&rsquo;s paper (without attribution), or claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is intolerable.</p>
<p>An author should not in general publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source(s). Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study, and seen and approved the final version of the paper and agreed to its submission for publication.</p>
<p>All authors should disclose in their manuscripts any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author&rsquo;s obligation to promptly notify the JEBT&rsquo;s editor-in-chief and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.</p>
<p>For more detailed information, visit&nbsp;<a href="http://publicationethics.org/">http://publicationethics.org/</a></p>
<p><strong><br /></strong></p>
<p><strong>Duties of Editors</strong></p>
<p>Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study&rsquo;s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal&rsquo;s scope. The Editor-in-Chief has full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content.&nbsp;Editors and editorial staff will keep<em>&nbsp;confidentiality</em>&nbsp;of the article. All submitted articles considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are expert in the field.</p>
<p><strong>Duties of Reviewers</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with authors, may assist authors in improving their articles. Only qualified referees will be invited to review an article. Any article received for review is a confidential document and will be treated as such; it will not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief. Reviews would be conducted objectively and observations formulated clearly with supporting arguments so that authors can use them for improving the article. Reviewers will identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors and will also notify the editors of any substantial similarity or overlap between the article and any other article (published or unpublished).</li>
<li><em>A</em>ny invited referee who has conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the manuscript and the work described will be immediately replace with more fair referee.</li>
<li>Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted article will not be used in a reviewer&rsquo;s own research without the express written consent of the authors. Information or ideas obtained through peer review will be kept confidential and not used for the reviewer&rsquo;s personal advantage.</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>