Thank you very much for reviewing this interesting study. I appreciate for the author/s to investigate this relatively new research avenue. Yet I encourage you to answer the following questions in the intro section:

(1) Who cares? What is the topic or research question, and why is it interesting and important in theory and practice?

(2) What do we know, what don't we know, and so what? What key theoretical perspectives and empirical findings have already informed the topic or question? What major, unaddressed puzzle, controversy, or paradox does this study address, and why does it need to be addressed?

(3) What will we learn? How does your study fundamentally change, challenge, or advance scholars' understanding?
Source: Grant and pollack (2011)
Methods:
I would recommend you use “perceived team innovationâ€ and “perceived team knowledge utilizationâ€ since you must aggregate the data first to have justification whether the data could be justified measured at the team level. Make sure there are sufficient nested data. Minimum 30 teams are there.