<p>Title: Technology or Technological?</p><p>Abstract: Indonesian abstract, especially the last 3-5 sentences sound strange.</p><p>Introduction:</p><p>-The last paragraph about gap is unclear. The frost two sentences do not seem to connect each other and need to be clarified.</p><p>- Novelty needs to be strengthened, implications for practice need to be added.</p><p>LR: looks fine</p><p>Methods: Need more explanation on how the questionnaire was developed</p><p>Results &amp; discussion:</p><p>-Table 3, what is SR &amp; Prob.? If Prob is significance, why H2 (0.031) concluded as supported?</p><p>-Demographic of participants better to be moved from methods to results discussion section</p><p>-Results &amp; discussion better to be expanded so that it is proportional to other sections. Because is results &amp; discussion is the very substance of this paper.</p><p>Limitations and future research:</p><p>-It is better to combine this section with conclusion</p><p>-Limitations need to mentioned first before suggesting future research direction</p><p>Conclusion: The sentences in this section in general are not clear, it is better to start with a sentence like “This study has found that…â€ </p><p>Others:</p><p>-Double check referencing, better to include also some references from JBM</p><p>-Misspelling here and the (e.g., in the very first paragraph)</p><p> </p>