A.N. Leontyev. (1981). Problems of The Development of The Mind. In Progress Publisher Moscow (Vol. 13, Issue 1).
Allen, D. K., Brown, A., Karanasios, S., & Norman, A. (2013). How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? A comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory. MIS Quarterly, 37, 835-854.
Beltramini, E. (2019). Life 3.0. Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, by Max Tegmark. In Religion & Theology (Vol. 26, Issues 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1163/15743012-02601006
Boasman-Patel, A. (2020). WHITEPAPER A future vision for the software market that the telecom industry needs to survive and thrive.
Bodker, S. (2009). Understanding Representation in Design. Human–Computer Interaction, 13(May 2013), 107–125. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1302_1 PLEASE
Bødker, S. (1987). Through the interface: An activity-theoretical perspective on human-computer interaction (DAIMI PB-2, Vol. 16, Issue 224). AARHUS University Computer Science Departmen.
Borges, A. F. S., Laurindo, F. J. B., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2021). The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 57(September 2020), 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102225
Chiu, Y. Te, Zhu, Y. Q., & Corbett, J. (2021). In the hearts and minds of employees: A model of pre-adoptive appraisal toward artificial intelligence in organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 60(August 2020), 102379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102379
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition: psychological and educational considerations. In Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–47).
Delicato, F. C., Al-Anbuky, A., & Wang, K. I. K. (2020). Editorial: Smart Cyber–Physical Systems: Toward Pervasive Intelligence systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 107(xxxx), 1134–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.06.031
Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., Ferreira, J., & Babu, J. (2020). Sustaining Open Source Communities by Understanding the Influence of Discursive Manifestations on Sentiment. Information Systems Frontiers, September. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10059-8
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57(July), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Engestorm, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974.
Engestrom, Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R. (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. In Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812774
Engeström, Y. (1987). LEARNING BY EXPANDING AN : AN ACTIVITY-THEORETICAL APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENTAL RESEARCH. In Helsinki, Orienta-Konsultit. (Vol. 20, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.20.1.78-85.1976
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Engestrom, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2007). From workplace learning to inter-organizational learning and back: The contribution of activity theory. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710777084
Feldman, M. P. (2002). The internet revolution and the geography of innovation. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00358
Foot, K. A. (2001). Cultural-historical activity theory as practice theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict-monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00233.x
Hasan, H., & Banna, S. (2012). The Unit of Analysis in IS Theory: The case for activity. Information Systems Foundations: Theory Building in Information Systems, 191–213. https://doi.org/10.22459/isf.10.2012.08
Hasan, H., Smith, S., & Finnegan, P. (2017). An activity theoretic analysis of the mediating role of information systems in tackling climate change adaptation. Information Systems Journal, 27(3), 271–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12104
Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A Framework for Collaborative Artificial Intelligence in Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.001
Jones, O., & Holt, R. (2008). The creation and evolution of new business ventures: An activity theory perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000810850847
Kaptelinin, V. (1994). Activity Theory: Implications for Human Computer Interaction. Human-Machine Communication for Educational Systems Design, 1, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85104-9_2
Kaptelinin, V., & Bonnie A. Nardi. (1997). Activity Theory : Basic Concepts and Applications. Context, 158–159.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2007). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. In The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i4.1772
Kaptelinin, V., & Uden, L. (2012). Understanding delegated actions : Toward an activity-theoretical perspective on customer-centred service design Activity theory AND HCI An activity-theoretical perspective in HCI goals conditions. 2012 Third Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation, 101–109.
Karanasios, S. (2018). Toward a unified view of technology and activity: The contribution of activity theory to information systems research. Information Technology and People, 31(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2016-0074
Kurweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking Penguin.
Kuutti, K. (1995). Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research. Published in B. Nardi (Ed.): Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, Cambridge: MIT Press, 17–44. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2137.003.0006
Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lewandowsky, S. (2016). Future Global Change and Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12188
Luhach, A. K., & Elçi, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence paradigms for smart cyber-physical systems. Artificial Intelligence Paradigms for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems, 1–392. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5101-1
Malaurent, J., & Karanasios, S. (2020). Learning from Workaround Practices: the Challenge of Enterprise System Implementations in Multinational Corporations. Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 639–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12272
Nardi, B. A. (1995). Context and Consciousness : Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. In MIT Press. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474209748.0004
Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human–computer interaction (pp. 69–102). In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (Vol. 69102, pp. 69–102). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)89021-4
Newman, J. Von. (1958). The Computer and the Brain. New Haven : Yale University Press.
Patalas-maliszewska, J., & Schlueter, N. (2019). Model of a Knowledge Management for System Integrator ( s ) of Cyber-Physical Production Systems ( CPPS ). International Scientific-Technical Confer- Ence Manufacturing, 92-103, 1, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18715-6
Poursoltan, M., Pinède, N., Traore, M. K., & Vallespir, B. (2021). A new descriptive, theoretical framework for cyber-physical and human systems based on activity theory. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(1), 918–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.109
Saputra, D. A. (2020). Business Process Management Standardization in Operation Support System : Case Study of Fulfillment and Assurance Process in an Indonesian Telecommunication Company. August, 136–141.
Schactzki, T. R. (2003). SOCIAL PRACTISES : A Witggensteinina Approach to Human Activity and the Social. In Cambridge University Press.
Schrettenbrunnner, M. B. (2020). Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Management. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(2), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.2990933
Schulz, T., Gewald, H., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Smart Mobility: Contradictions in Value Co-Creation. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10055-y
Sukoco, A., Prihatmanto, A. S., Wijaya, R., Sadad, I., & Darmakusuma, R. (2019). SEMUT : Next Generation Public Transportation Architecture in the Era IoT and Big Data. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(12), 4052–4059. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Syam, N., & Sharma, A. (2018). Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 69(December 2017), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.019
Thomas Davenport, Abhijit Guha, Dhruv Grewal, T. B. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of bullion production. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 24–42.
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. M. E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, New York.
White, L., Burger, K., & Yearworth, M. (2016). Understanding behaviour in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(3), 983–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.044
Zhang, K., Shi, Y., & Karnouskos, S. (2023). Advancements in Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems : An Overview and Perspectives. IEEE Transaction on Industrial Informatics, 19(1), 716–729.
Zhou, J., Zhou, Y., Wang, B., & Zang, J. (2019). Human–Cyber–Physical Systems (HCPSs) in the Context of New-Generation Intelligent Manufacturing. Engineering, 5(4), 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.015